How a healthcare e-commerce account grew to about $89K a month at $141 per purchase
I took over a healthcare e-commerce brand’s Google Ads in July 2025. Over the next six months the account spent $491,234 and recorded 3,096 purchases. From September to December, spend averaged about $88,600 a month and each purchase cost $141.23.
July was the expensive month. Purchase tracking was the first thing I fixed, and July recorded 128 purchases on $62,760. Every month after it came in between $136 and $161 per purchase. July is on this page, and so is a softer December.
Want this checked on your own account? The New-Customer Read is a free 30-minute review of your Google Ads with me. Get my New-Customer Read
On this page
- What did the six months look like?
- Why doesn’t healthcare e-commerce scale like other stores?
- What was broken?
- What changed, and in what order?
- How was this measured?
- What got worse?
- What would I take from this?
What did the six months look like?
| Month | Ad spend | Purchases | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|
| July | $62,760 | 128 | $490.52 |
| August | $73,991 | 458 | $161.49 |
| September | $81,846 | 601 | $136.18 |
| October | $88,022 | 607 | $145.05 |
| November | $98,414 | 721 | $136.40 |
| December (to the 28th) | $86,201 | 581 | $148.47 |
| Six months | $491,234 | 3,096 | $158.66 |
From August to the September–December average, monthly spend rose 19.8% and monthly purchases rose 37.0%. Cost per purchase went down as spend went up.
Why doesn’t healthcare e-commerce scale like other stores?
From the outside it looks like any direct-to-consumer store. Inside the ad account it isn’t. Policy rules, product restrictions and approvals add friction at every step.
For most stores, Shopping is the clearest way to catch buyers who already know what they want. In healthcare, Shopping is often delayed or blocked by approvals. And when purchases aren’t tracked well, accounts drift toward easier numbers like registrations. That keeps an account running. It doesn’t let it grow.
What was broken?
- Purchase tracking wasn’t reliable. Registrations were recorded. Purchases weren’t captured well enough for Google to bid on them.
- Shopping wasn’t live. Merchant Center wasn’t fully set up, so the account had no Shopping at all.
- More spend would have bought more noise. Without clean purchase data or Shopping, raising the budget meant spending harder, not better.
What changed, and in what order?
- Purchase tracking repaired. Real purchases became the number Google bid on, instead of registrations.
- Merchant Center fixed. The product feed was made stable and compliant, so Shopping could run.
- Shopping launched. Over the six months, the main Shopping campaign was the account’s second-biggest campaign by spend.
- Judged on cost per purchase. Registrations stayed as a quality check, not a stand-in for sales.
Spend only went up after the first two were in place.
How was this measured?
Ad spend and purchases come from the Google Ads account, for every campaign in it, July 1 to December 28, 2025. The window stops on December 28 so the last week is whole. Purchases are the account’s purchase conversion, by the day of the click, so some are fractions and the totals are rounded.
An earlier version of this page counted a narrower set of campaigns, which made cost per purchase look lower. This one counts all of them. These are purchases Google reported, not a count of new customers.
What got worse?
July. $490.52 per purchase, while tracking was being fixed.
December. Cost per purchase rose to $148.47, from $136.40 in November. Year-end auctions, seasonal buying and product mix all move that. Tracking and Shopping stayed in place.
What would I take from this?
Fix what Google counts before asking it to spend more. Here, that meant purchase tracking first, then the feed, then Shopping, and only then a bigger budget.
.png)




